Dear Jamie Oliver,
Thank you for your new show, Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution. To be honest, at first, I avoided it. You see, I am overweight. I figured I didn’t need another show reprimanding me and making me feel guilty and bad about myself. Then, a friend I respect a lot wrote about your show and made me curious and I decided to check it out myself. I've been very pleasantly surprised, it was not what I thought and although I'm still making my way through the series, I had some thoughts I wanted to share.
Please, please, please be careful with your facts. Your entire message gets diluted and weakened when you rely on inaccuracies. There are enough problems with our country's school lunch program without relying on sensational, but inaccurate information.
An example. You're fond of saying chocolate milk has more sugar than your favorite soda. When I heard this repeatedly on your show I was horrified as my younger daughter drinks chocolate milk and I would never allow her to drink soda. Now, I think there's a valid argument that white milk would be a better choice, but chocolate milk does not contain more sugar than soda. Chocolate milk has 27 g of sugar, white milk has 12g. Therefore, 15g of sugar are added to chocolate milk, approximately 4 teaspoons worth. That's a lot, more than I would have thought, but no where near the 39 g of sugar, almost 10 teaspoons of sugar, in a Coke. I love the school districts that have upped white milk consumption by serving it ice cold and with paper straws, eliminating the paper cartons that tend to smell. Why not just make the point that white milk is a better choice? I might be tempted to argue that chocolate milk a child will drink is a better choice than unopened white milk in the garbage, but it's a truthful debate whichever side you're on. When you rely on inaccurate statements that sound horrifying but don't hold up, I tend to question everything you're saying. Your message is too important for that.
I completely agree that obesity is a major crisis in this country. I can not find one source that claims the next generation is in danger of dying in their 30's and 40's from it however. Again, make the points you can accurately and leave sensationalism out of it. The rising rates of diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, and joint degeneration should provide you with more than enough accurate information to convince people a change is direly needed.
Could you also quit telling kids to clean their plates, eat up, etc.? That kind of rhetoric is just plain wrong, old-fashioned, and potentially damaging. I encourage my kids to eat until they're satisfied. To learn to listen to their bodies. It doesn't work all the time, granted. Sometimes kids do need encouragement, especially when trying new foods, but please don't tell them they should be cleaning their plates.
I love what you've done in England, I love that you're calling attention to problems in the American school lunch program. I'm very sad that our country has failed our children so miserably. It's ridiculous that french fries and ketchup count as vegetables. There is much wrong and definitely much to be fixed. It's horrifying that kids are not being served freshly prepared foods instead of frozen, heat to eat foods chock full of fillers, preservatives and chemicals. I bemoan the fact that my kid's school serves canned vegetables that no kid would eat instead of fresh, tasty alternatives. There's definitely a lot to criticize and a lot to work to change. May I say however that it was more than a little arrogant to show up in a town that desperately needs help determined to force your fix upon it without playing by the rules? Yes, the rules are archaic and wrong, but they're still the rules, they still need to be played by. If you can not even come in at or under budget how in the world do you expect the school system to? If you are ignorant of the FDA requirements, and neglect to meet the current nutritional standards, how do you expect the people in charge in Huntington to take you seriously and respect you? Speaking of respect, you would probably get a lot further with people if you showed them more respect, especially the people in charge who are meeting you more than halfway. How much easier would the Huntington food administrator's job have been if you had done your homework and known the standards? If the high school standard is 1 1/4 cups of fruits/vegetables per lunch, you should have not only known that, you should have delighted in it and respected it. You created a wonderful dish of stir-fried vegetables and noodles. How simple would it have been to add a small oriental salad? Instead of mocking the fact that none of the kids were taking the salad that makes up the requirement on the other line, offer them something that they will eat. You're a chef aren't you?
If kids love chicken nuggets and pizza you're not going to make great strides taking their favorite foods completely away from them. Indeed, most nutritional experts would agree there's no reason to. Why not teach the cooks how to make a healthy chicken nugget? It can definitely be done. Ditto pizza on a whole wheat crust with low-fat cheese and turkey pepperoni. If your message is that people's favorite foods are "bad" and should be eliminated, long-lasting change is not very feasible.
I think you're on the right track. I think you raise a lot of very valid and important points. I'm just disappointed that you've chosen to do it in a way that leaves critics so much room to avoid the real, and important, issues.
10 comments:
I haven't watched the show yet, but you have me curious now!
I found it online and have been watching while I walk on my treadmill. It's interesting. If you watch it let me know what you think.
you know what - my children's ped. told me to give them chocolate milk over water!!! Seriously, they hate milk and I didn't want to give them chocolate milk all the time and she told me IT WAS FINE!!
I haven't been watching, but I find your post very interesting. As I've tried to eat healthier one of the changes I have made is to stop eating school lunch and pack my own. I hate to say it, but this has made a huge difference. I understand the kids are not trying to lose weight and many of them, especially the boys, need the calories, but man, they have to be high in most of the meals that are served.
Been following your blog for a while and love it! I think it is really honorable what Jamie Oliver is trying to do. As a college freshman with MANY MANY MANY food sensitivities, I was appalled that my college could not offer me one thing that I could eat! I blame many of my digestive issues on the processed crap being served to Americans daily. I know we make conscious choices as adults to eat the way we do, but children have no say in their school lunches. The things that are in their processed, frozen, re-heat-to-serve items no doubt are contributing significantly to a rise in gastro. issues in young children. Couple that with increased stress in school and you have a recipe for stomach disaster! If Jamie Oliver can get the crap in and institute a system where schools serve wholesome, fresh foods with minimal ingredients then I think it would save millions of children from having to go through what I am going through. It would reduce the number of overweight children and it would ultimately (we hope) change the dynamics of the taste buds of Americans (especially children).
If you would like to consider this issue more, I suggest Mrs. Q's blog fedupwithschoollunch.blogspot.com
You have to remember that a lot of what you see on the program is sensationalized for ratings. I can't imagine that Jamie Oliver (or the producers behind the show) began the program without knowing the facts. If everything went off without a hitch, what kind of a show would it be?
When you're comparing grams of sugar in soda vs chocolate milk, are you comparing equal portions? A 12 oz soda has 39 grams of sugar, true, but what are you comparing that against?
I do agree with you that he could offer healthy alternatives to pizza and nuggets - stuff the kids will eat. However, I applaud him with stepping in and trying to get kids to expand their tastes.
I'm just sorry not everyone is embracing what he's trying to do. I see the number of overweight kids at my kids' school - girls who need bras in the 1st grade! - and it's disgusting.
Melissa was right. Due to the wording, I mistook the serving size. Coke has 39 grams of sugar in a 12 oz. size. That would mean an 8 oz. serving has 26 grams, and Jamie is right, that's less than (although almost equal) chocolate milk; however I still believe, as does our family doctor, that chocolate milk is an acceptably healthy choice.
So funny--I did the same thing with the chocolate milk vs. soda thing. It really depends on the brand of milk! Even at our gym, there are three different kinds of chocolate milk and one brand has almost double the amount of sugar per serving as the lowest-sugar brand. Milk has "sugar" to begin with (lactose) but the kind of chocolate they add makes a big difference so I was glad he got me to pay attention! Even before I checked though, I was reminding myself that there are still good things in the milk that are never in soda so we're still "ahead".
As to the "playing by the rules"--I'm still appalled that brown rice can't replace bread (thank you wheat lobby) and they had to add a roll to a stir fry meal so there would be a bread serving; and that french fries count as a vegetable. These kinds of thinking are SO outdated, they would trip up anyone, I think.
I'm with you on the budget and the healthier-version of what kids love, though. I appreciate him trying to stretch the palates though. My kids are not adventuresome with me but they might be for someone else.
Haven't watched this week's yet but I've enjoyed it so far!
I don't get this TV show here - or many others for that matter. But I loved your letter and can only imagine from it what the shows is about.
I struggle with the lunches provided at my daughters' school. I don't find them healthy or tasty, yet unless I'm willing to provide a lunch every day, I have no other alternatives. I look forward to seeing what they have for them next year in California.
Thanks for the link, Stacey! This is such an important program, and as Melissa said, the producers have to "put on a show" to create a hook and an interest in what's going on in Huntington. I am sure a massive amount of research went into planning the revolution in Huntington.
I, too, wish more was said about the beaucracy of exactly WHY cheap, disgusting food is being served in our schools. But I'm hoping the show generated enough interest that people will begin to educate themselves about what's going on in our schools, and start speaking up to make a difference. I'm going to a showing of the movie "Two Angry Moms" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jst9-Md-UgA) next week. And I'll be writing a review of the movie on my blog.
Post a Comment